Channel identification guide

RTS Muzika in Serbia · channel ID and TV guide

RTS Muzika in Serbia uses the catalogue ID RTSMuzika.rs. See its feed details, matching names and local guide times.

Look for RTSMuzika.rs when you match RTS Muzika in Serbia. The directory lists Radio Televizija Srbije in the owner field.

Station details

Source identifier
RTSMuzika.rs
Source geography
Serbia · RS
Programme categories
music
Site listed in the snapshot
rts.rs
Alternative labels
РТС Музика
Owner field
Radio Televizija Srbije

Other feeds to check

The directory also lists RTS Drama under RTSDrama.rs. A shared group, call sign or operator site can connect the entries while each guide keeps its own ID.

Station records with a shared directory field
NameMarketCatalogue IDCatalogue group or site
RTS DramaSerbiaRTSDrama.rsRadio Televizija Srbije
RTS KlasikaSerbiaRTSKlasika.rsRadio Televizija Srbije

Match the TV guide

Check that a similar name refers to the intended television service.

<channel id="RTSMuzika.rs">…</channel>
<programme channel="RTSMuzika.rs" start="20250715200000 +0200">…</programme>

Compare the two ID strings in your guide export. The directory key above is the reference for this feed.

Historical time conversions for the example XMLTV entry. Match the date and location of your actual feed.
Example zoneLocal timeThe same time in UTC
Europe/Belgrade15 Jan 2025 20:00 +010015 Jan 19:00 UTC
Europe/Belgrade15 Jul 2025 20:00 +020015 Jul 18:00 UTC

Try the XMLTV test file

The linked fixture uses a historical date and an illustrative title. It can verify whether your player joins records by ID.

Open the XMLTV test file

Reading the result for this station
CheckWhat to look for
Import resultLook for “RTS Muzika | guide alignment test” against RTSMuzika.rs in the historic guide data.
Blank guide for this stationCompare the exported channel identifier with RTSMuzika.rs exactly, including punctuation and letter case.
Alternate nameThe catalogue includes “РТС Музика”. Check the identifier even if the on-screen name looks right.

Sources and further reading