Channel identification guide

Motorvision in Germany · channel ID and TV guide

Motorvision in Germany uses the catalogue ID Motorvision.de. See its feed details, matching names and local guide times.

Look for Motorvision.de when you match Motorvision in Germany. The directory lists German Car TV Programm GmbH in the owner field.

Station details

Source identifier
Motorvision.de
Source geography
Germany · DE
Programme categories
auto
Site listed in the snapshot
motorvision.tv
Alternative labels
Motorvision TV
Owner field
German Car TV Programm GmbH

Similar channel names

Motorvision+ in Germany can turn up in the same search. Compare its ID (MotorvisionPlus.de) with Motorvision.de before switching the listing.

Compare the source IDs before changing the feed
NameMarketCatalogue IDCatalogue group or site
Motorvision+GermanyMotorvisionPlus.deGerman Car TV Programm GmbH

Match the TV guide

Use the event date and session, since a same-name listing may show a replay.

<channel id="Motorvision.de">…</channel>
<programme channel="Motorvision.de" start="20250715200000 +0200">…</programme>

Compare the two ID strings in your guide export. The directory key above is the reference for this feed.

Historical time conversions for the example XMLTV entry. Match the date and location of your actual feed.
Example zoneLocal timeThe same time in UTC
Europe/Berlin15 Jan 2025 20:00 +010015 Jan 19:00 UTC
Europe/Berlin15 Jul 2025 20:00 +020015 Jul 18:00 UTC

Try the XMLTV test file

The linked fixture uses a historical date and an illustrative title. It can verify whether your player joins records by ID.

Open the XMLTV test file

Reading the result for this station
CheckWhat to look for
Import resultLook for “Motorvision | guide alignment test” against Motorvision.de in the historic guide data.
Blank guide for this stationCompare the exported channel identifier with Motorvision.de exactly, including punctuation and letter case.
Alternate nameThe catalogue includes “Motorvision TV”. Check the identifier even if the on-screen name looks right.

Sources and further reading