Channel identification guide

Canal 8 Telecable Carbonifera in Mexico · channel ID and TV guide

Canal 8 Telecable Carbonifera in Mexico uses the catalogue ID Canal8TelecableCarbonifera.mx. See its feed details, matching names and local guide times.

Look for Canal8TelecableCarbonifera.mx when you match Canal 8 Telecable Carbonifera in Mexico. The directory lists Telecable Carbonífera in the owner field.

Station details

Source identifier
Canal8TelecableCarbonifera.mx
Source geography
Mexico · MX
Programme categories
general
Site listed in the snapshot
telcammuzquiz.com
Owner field
Telecable Carbonífera

Look for the operator’s schedule

The directory points to telcammuzquiz.com for this station. Use the local listing to check local programme and feed edition.

Match the TV guide

Compare one local bulletin or other known programme before accepting a same-name entry.

<channel id="Canal8TelecableCarbonifera.mx">…</channel>
<programme channel="Canal8TelecableCarbonifera.mx" start="20250715200000 -0600">…</programme>

Compare the two ID strings in your guide export. The directory key above is the reference for this feed.

Historical time conversions for the example XMLTV entry. Match the date and location of your actual feed.
Example zoneLocal timeThe same time in UTC
America/Mexico_City15 Jul 2025 20:00 -060016 Jul 02:00 UTC
America/Cancun15 Jul 2025 20:00 -050016 Jul 01:00 UTC

Try the XMLTV test file

The linked fixture uses a historical date and an illustrative title. It can verify whether your player joins records by ID.

Open the XMLTV test file

Reading the result for this station
CheckWhat to look for
Import resultLook for “Canal 8 Telecable Carbonifera | guide alignment test” against Canal8TelecableCarbonifera.mx in the historic guide data.
Blank guide for this stationCompare the exported channel identifier with Canal8TelecableCarbonifera.mx exactly, including punctuation and letter case.
Alternate nameThe catalogue includes “Canal 8 Telecable Carbonífera”. Check the identifier even if the on-screen name looks right.

Sources and further reading